Record-based review: A Kensington, Maryland Jobber record lists completed polyurethane injection and a finishing item for trimming packers and patching the wall. A later closed record is associated with the same customer but has no work scope or notes. The two entries do not establish that a crew returned for a second field visit or why the later record was created.

What was included in the documented injection scope?

The first record lists polyurethane grout injection and a separate finishing description: cut off injection packers, remove excess material, and patch the surface with cementitious mortar. These are distinct tasks in the scope. The record alone does not show the condition of the crack before work, the number of site visits or a finished-repair photograph.

Does a later record prove a return visit?

No. The later entry is closed and has no line items or notes describing work. It could reflect a follow-up, an administrative entry or something else; we cannot choose among those explanations without a dated crew note or same-job photo. We have removed the earlier story about a month-long curing or scheduling gap because neither explanation was documented.

What outcome can be claimed?

The available record supports completed injection service, but not a post-rain performance test or a long-term dry-basement result. Images formerly displayed with this article were not matched to this Kensington job and have been removed. A homeowner comparing proposals should ask what injection and finishing steps are included, how the repair will be documented, and what follow-up applies if water reappears.

Learn more about our foundation crack repair service.